[is this thing still on?]
It’s been a long time since I blogged, but today’s RBA statement has lit a modest fire …
Before I riff on what’s wrong with the Bank, let me put down some context. The Bank’s main job is to keep inflation at 2.5%, with a control range of 2% to 3%.
At present, inflation is both below the 2.5% target and below the 2% to 3% control range; and it is not expected to get back inside the control range until some time in late 2019. The chart below is from the RBA’s Q2 SOMP, and it captures their failure … sorry boss, i’m missing my target and i don’t know when i’m going to hit it. Given the gentle up-slope of their CPI forecast, i would say the central case is a return to 2.5% inflation around 2025 …
Given that the NAIRU is probably 5% and that we’re around 5.75% just now, monetary policy should be easy: it’s either on hold with an easing bias, or cutting, right?
Well that’s so pre-GFC. RBA Gov Dr Lowe was an early contributor to the financial stability literature, writing papers in his time at the BIS (with Borio) which encouraged central bankers to take a different view:
central banks should consider paying greater attention to credit in their monetary policy strategies than is generally the case at present. Specifically, simply setting monetary policy so that a two-year inflation forecast is at the central bank’s target may, on occasions, be less than optimal.
Gov Lowe and Assistant Gov Kent even wrote a paper together in 1998.
So rate cuts are not on, given the highly-leveraged Aussie household balance sheet and the recently rapid appreciation of house prices. That’s a bit inconvenient given the yawning gap to the inflation target and the troubling state of the labour market (at best mixed, probably trend loosening) and the still-bleak capex outlook.
So what to do? Cheer-lead.
GDP downgrade? No problem, it’s still going back to 3.25% … 3.25% is like the horizon, always the same distance away …
Remember how they dropped 100bps of GDP when Q3 GDP unexpectedly contracted due to ‘temporary factors’?
And today they downgraded Q1 GDP in their words.
But it’s all no problem, because it’s going back to 3.25% in a few years time, right?
What’s the point of being downbeat? They have already decided that they cannot cut, so they might as well tell business that the medium term outlook is okay. Perhaps it’ll boost business investment and help to solve their problems?
It’s not working so far. The ABS Q1 Capex report was bleak. After making all the nerdy adjustments it suggests that investment is going to crash by 10% in 2017/18 — this means that the RBA’s growth forecasts are about 100bps too strong.
What does the RBA say?
the transition to lower levels of mining investment following the mining investment boom is almost complete. Business conditions have improved and capacity utilisation has increased. Business investment has picked up in those parts of the country not directly affected by the decline in mining investment.
Well maybe … except that firms told the ABS that they plan to spend less in 2017/18 than they did in 2016/17.
I suppose that there’s no point talking about it unless you are going to do something about it … might as well get out the pop-poms and cheer-lead.
I’m clever, I’m cute! MIT was a hoot!
PHD and neat hair! Central banking isn’t fair!
I’m smart and you’re not! your housing is too hot!
Macro-pru is so cool! I dominate the fools!
inflation? a mess! return to target is a guess!
invest please? I smile … i know you think i’m vile.
I could help but … i won’t … after 1.5% there’s a moat.
so invest please, I roar! I swear I’m not a whore!
We cheer and we lead! We act like we’re on speed!
Don’t hate us cause we’re beautiful well we don’t like u either!